| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i5-7500


Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i5-7500 gets 191.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.9 times faster than the i5-7500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
906e9
Core
Renoir
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2020
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
61.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
191.71k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
25.59k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
22.57k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
5.27k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
8.08k (x0.98)
TOTAL
53k
61.51k (x1.16)

Multithread

4900HS

i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
88.3k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
78.59k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
19.72k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
5.1k (x0.68)
TOTAL
360.57k
191.71k (x0.53)

Performance/W
4900HS
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
1358 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
1209 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
303 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
2949 points/W

Performance/GHz
4900HS
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
6734 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
5939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
16186 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4