Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i5-7200U
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 3.7 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 3.7 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
806e9
Core
Renoir
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2020
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
97.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
19.34k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
17.47k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
4.08k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
4.04k (x0.49)
TOTAL
53k
44.94k (x0.85)
Multithread
4900HS
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
42.86k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
41.3k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
9.69k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
3.68k (x0.49)
TOTAL
360.57k
97.52k (x0.27)
Performance/W
4900HS
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
2857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
2753 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
245 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
6501 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
6239 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
5637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
14496 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4