| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i5-5200U


Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4900HS is 5.2 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
306d4
Core
Renoir
Broadwell-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
2 /4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2020
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
68.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
13.58k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
12.14k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
3.18k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
2.92k (x0.36)
TOTAL
53k
31.81k (x0.6)

Multithread

4900HS

i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
28.89k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
28.74k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
7.31k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
3.74k (x0.5)
TOTAL
360.57k
68.69k (x0.19)

Performance/W
4900HS
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
1926 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
1916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
488 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
4579 points/W

Performance/GHz
4900HS
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
5029 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
4497 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
1176 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
1080 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
11782 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4