| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i5-1038NG7


Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
706e5
Core
Renoir
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
23.2k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
21.2k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
9.4k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
11.54k (x1.4)
TOTAL
53k
65.35k (x1.23)

Multithread

4900HS

i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
94.68k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
103.38k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
35.79k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
9.33k (x1.24)
TOTAL
360.57k
243.18k (x0.67)

Performance/W
4900HS
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
8685 points/W

Performance/GHz
4900HS
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4