Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i3-4030U
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i3-4030U gets 46.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 7.8 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i3-4030U gets 46.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 7.8 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
40651
Core
Renoir
Haswell
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2020
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
46.09k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
10.69k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
6.16k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
2.49k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
2.23k (x0.27)
TOTAL
53k
21.57k (x0.41)
Multithread
4900HS
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
21.84k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
15.86k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
5.94k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
2.45k (x0.32)
TOTAL
360.57k
46.09k (x0.13)
Performance/W
4900HS
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
1057 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
396 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
163 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
3073 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
5627 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
3241 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
11353 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4