Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i3-1005G1
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 116.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 3.1 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 116.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 3.1 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
706e5
Core
Renoir
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
50.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
116.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
19.45k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
16.75k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
8.04k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
6.38k (x0.78)
TOTAL
53k
50.62k (x0.96)
Multithread
4900HS
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
46.52k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
48.76k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
17.12k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
4.23k (x0.56)
TOTAL
360.57k
116.63k (x0.32)
Performance/W
4900HS
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
3102 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
3251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
1141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
7776 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
5721 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
4926 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
2365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
1877 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
14889 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4