Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Engineering Sample 506E8
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 506E8 gets 211.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.7 times faster than the 506E8. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 506E8 gets 211.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.7 times faster than the 506E8. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
506e8
Core
Renoir
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2020
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
56.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
211.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
23.91k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
21.03k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
5.05k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
6.4k (x0.78)
TOTAL
53k
56.39k (x1.06)
Multithread
4900HS
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
95.3k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
91.94k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
22.06k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
2.3k (x0.31)
TOTAL
360.57k
211.6k (x0.59)
Performance/W
4900HS
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W