| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Engineering Sample 906ED 2.1GHz


Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 906ED 2.1GHz is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 906ED 2.1GHz gets 657.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 906ED 2.1GHz is 1.8 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
906ed
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2020
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
86.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
657.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
33.92k (x2.28)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
30k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
7.01k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
15.73k (x1.91)
TOTAL
53k
86.65k (x1.63)

Multithread

4900HS

906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
302.78k (x2.43)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
278.98k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
67.89k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
7.53k (x1)
TOTAL
360.57k
657.19k (x1.82)

Performance/W
4900HS
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W