Ryzen 9 4900HS vs 5900HS
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.2 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 1.2 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
a50f00
Core
Renoir
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2020
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
21.2k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
25k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
11.44k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
24.22k (x2.95)
TOTAL
53k
81.87k (x1.54)
Multithread
4900HS
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
145.13k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
198.36k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
85.67k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
5.79k (x0.77)
TOTAL
360.57k
434.96k (x1.21)
Performance/W
4900HS
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4