| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Ryzen 5 5600


Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5600 is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600 is 1.2 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a20f12
Core
Renoir
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2020
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
83.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
429.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
22.73k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
24.59k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
11.44k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
25.03k (x3.05)
TOTAL
53k
83.79k (x1.58)

Multithread

4900HS

5600
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
134.28k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
178.56k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
78.16k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
38.26k (x5.08)
TOTAL
360.57k
429.25k (x1.19)

Performance/W
4900HS
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
2066 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
1202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
589 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
4900HS
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
2599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
5688 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
19043 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4