| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Ryzen 3 3350U


Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 3350U gets 144.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.5 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
810f81
Core
Renoir
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2020
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
43.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
144.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
13.25k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
21.67k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
4.79k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
3.98k (x0.48)
TOTAL
53k
43.7k (x0.82)

Multithread

4900HS

3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
46.47k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
78.38k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
16.69k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
3.3k (x0.44)
TOTAL
360.57k
144.84k (x0.4)

Performance/W
4900HS
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
3098 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
1113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
9656 points/W

Performance/GHz
4900HS
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
6191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
1138 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
12485 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4