Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 2.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
810f81
Core
Renoir
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
168.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
14.48k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
23.84k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
5.43k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
5.46k (x0.66)
TOTAL
53k
49.21k (x0.93)
Multithread
4900HS
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
54.39k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
88.77k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
20.04k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
5.48k (x0.73)
TOTAL
360.57k
168.69k (x0.47)
Performance/W
4900HS
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4