Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i7-11700F
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.4 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.4 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0671
Core
Renoir
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
512.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
32.55k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
26.95k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
10.76k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
19.32k (x2.35)
TOTAL
53k
89.58k (x1.69)
Multithread
4900HS
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
232.06k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
203.56k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
72.89k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
3.81k (x0.51)
TOTAL
360.57k
512.32k (x1.42)
Performance/W
4900HS
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
7882 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4