Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i5-11300H
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.3 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.3 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
806c1
Core
Renoir
Tiger Lake H35
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2020
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
285.75k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
25.83k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
23.56k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
9.2k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
5.06k (x0.62)
TOTAL
53k
63.64k (x1.2)
Multithread
4900HS
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
116.87k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
121.08k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
41.8k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
6k (x0.8)
TOTAL
360.57k
285.75k (x0.79)
Performance/W
4900HS
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
8164 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4