Ryzen 9 3950X vs Core i5-1038NG7
Description
The 3950X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3950X gets a score of 959.8 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3950X is 3.9 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3950X gets a score of 959.8 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3950X is 3.9 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
706e5
Core
Matisse
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
16/32
4/8
TDP
105 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
16x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
72.95k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
959.77k points
243.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3950X
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.49k
23.2k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
26.16k
21.2k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.9k
9.4k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.4k
11.54k (x0.52)
TOTAL
72.95k
65.35k (x0.9)
Multithread
3950X
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
334.49k
94.68k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
423.74k
103.38k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
187.85k
35.79k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
9.33k (x0.68)
TOTAL
959.77k
243.18k (x0.25)
Performance/W
3950X
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
3186 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4036 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1789 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
130 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
9141 points/W
8685 points/W
Performance/GHz
3950X
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
3509 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5566 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1681 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4765 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
15522 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4