| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3950X vs Core i3-1005G1


Description
The 3950X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3950X gets a score of 959.8 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 116.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3950X is 8.2 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
706e5
Core
Matisse
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
16/32
2/4
TDP
105 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
16x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
72.95k points
50.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
959.77k points
116.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3950X
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
16.49k
19.45k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
26.16k
16.75k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.9k
8.04k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.4k
6.38k (x0.28)
TOTAL
72.95k
50.62k (x0.69)

Multithread

3950X

i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
334.49k
46.52k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
423.74k
48.76k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
187.85k
17.12k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
4.23k (x0.31)
TOTAL
959.77k
116.63k (x0.12)

Performance/W
3950X
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3186 points/W
3102 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4036 points/W
3251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1789 points/W
1141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
130 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
9141 points/W
7776 points/W

Performance/GHz
3950X
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3509 points/GHz
5721 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5566 points/GHz
4926 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1681 points/GHz
2365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4765 points/GHz
1877 points/GHz
TOTAL
15522 points/GHz
14889 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4