Ryzen 9 3950X vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
Both models 3950X and 4600H are based on Zen 2 architecture.
Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3950X gets a score of 959.8 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3950X is 2.9 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3950X gets a score of 959.8 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3950X is 2.9 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
860f01
Core
Matisse
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
16/32
6/12
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
16x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
72.95k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
959.77k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3950X
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.49k
15.48k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
26.16k
22.82k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.9k
8.63k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.4k
7.17k (x0.32)
TOTAL
72.95k
54.11k (x0.74)
Multithread
3950X
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
334.49k
117.98k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
423.74k
146.43k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
187.85k
65.54k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
4.77k (x0.35)
TOTAL
959.77k
334.72k (x0.35)
Performance/W
3950X
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
3186 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4036 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1789 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
130 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
9141 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
3950X
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
3509 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5566 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1681 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4765 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
15522 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4