Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i7-7560U
Description
The 3900X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 7.8 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 7.8 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
806e9
Core
Matisse
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/4
TDP
105 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
72.51k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
756.3k points
97.27k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900X
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.46k
3.56k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
18.46k
12.71k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
3.93k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.71k
8.89k (x0.38)
TOTAL
54.68k
29.09k (x0.53)
Multithread
3900X
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
52.65k
6.34k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
265.41k
29.51k (x0.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.78k
8.94k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
46.91k
14.72k (x0.31)
TOTAL
505.76k
59.51k (x0.12)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3900X
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.35k
12.78k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
25.87k
18.79k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.72k
4.72k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.86k
8.95k (x0.32)
TOTAL
79.8k
45.24k (x0.57)
Multithread
3900X
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
201.57k
23.04k (x0.11)
Test#2 (FP)
284.41k
40.07k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
145.16k
10.08k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
100.56k
15.24k (x0.15)
TOTAL
731.7k
88.42k (x0.12)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900X
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
12.88k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
20.02k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.23k
4.15k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
8.97k (x0.36)
TOTAL
76.38k
46.02k (x0.6)
Multithread
3900X
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
196.31k
23k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
290.5k
41.21k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
143.95k
9.92k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.92k
14.9k (x0.23)
TOTAL
695.69k
89.03k (x0.13)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900X
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.73k
19.37k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
17.26k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
3.78k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.22k
7.75k (x0.35)
TOTAL
72.51k
48.16k (x0.66)
Multithread
3900X
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
248.24k
39.17k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
309.66k
38.24k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.01k
8.9k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
58.39k
10.97k (x0.19)
TOTAL
756.3k
97.27k (x0.13)
Performance/W
3900X
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
2364 points/W
2611 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2949 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
556 points/W
731 points/W
TOTAL
7203 points/W
6485 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900X
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
5097 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5377 points/GHz
4543 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4831 points/GHz
2041 points/GHz
TOTAL
15763 points/GHz
12674 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4