Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i5-9500
Description
The 3900X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 2.1 times faster than the i5-9500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 2.1 times faster than the i5-9500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
906ea
Core
Matisse
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/6
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
9216 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
72.51k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
756.3k points
352.84k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900X
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.46k
4.45k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
18.46k
18.43k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
5.84k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.71k
12.63k (x0.53)
TOTAL
54.68k
41.34k (x0.76)
Multithread
3900X
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
52.65k
24.75k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
265.41k
103.1k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.78k
32.43k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
46.91k
5.56k (x0.12)
TOTAL
505.76k
165.85k (x0.33)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3900X
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
17.35k
16.06k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
25.87k
23.19k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.72k
6.1k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.86k
12.79k (x0.46)
TOTAL
79.8k
58.14k (x0.73)
Multithread
3900X
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
201.57k
90.44k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
284.41k
131.23k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
145.16k
33.85k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
100.56k
5.59k (x0.06)
TOTAL
731.7k
261.11k (x0.36)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900X
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
16.14k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
24.18k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.23k
5.87k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
12.5k (x0.5)
TOTAL
76.38k
58.69k (x0.77)
Multithread
3900X
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
196.31k
92.21k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
290.5k
137.92k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
143.95k
33.12k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.92k
5.56k (x0.09)
TOTAL
695.69k
268.8k (x0.39)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900X
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
16.73k
29.17k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
25.49k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
5.84k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.22k
13.15k (x0.59)
TOTAL
72.51k
73.65k (x1.02)
Multithread
3900X
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
248.24k
166.66k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
309.66k
146.9k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.01k
34.04k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
58.39k
5.25k (x0.09)
TOTAL
756.3k
352.84k (x0.47)
Performance/W
3900X
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
2364 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2949 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
556 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
7203 points/W
5428 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900X
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5377 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4831 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
15763 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4