Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i5-5675R
Description
The 3900X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 3.9 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 3.9 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
40671
Core
Matisse
Bradwell-H
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/4
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
72.51k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
756.3k points
194.2k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900X
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.46k
4.14k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
18.46k
14.35k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
4.94k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.71k
5.47k (x0.23)
TOTAL
54.68k
28.91k (x0.53)
Multithread
3900X
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
52.65k
16.02k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
265.41k
54.6k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.78k
18.69k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
46.91k
16.87k (x0.36)
TOTAL
505.76k
106.18k (x0.21)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3900X
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
17.35k
12.86k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
25.87k
16.85k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.72k
5.19k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.86k
5.49k (x0.2)
TOTAL
79.8k
40.39k (x0.51)
Multithread
3900X
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
201.57k
50.07k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
284.41k
64.61k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
145.16k
19.84k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
100.56k
17.09k (x0.17)
TOTAL
731.7k
151.6k (x0.21)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900X
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
12.88k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
18.27k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.23k
5.12k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
5.45k (x0.22)
TOTAL
76.38k
41.72k (x0.55)
Multithread
3900X
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
196.31k
49.91k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
290.5k
70.3k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
143.95k
19.69k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.92k
16.92k (x0.26)
TOTAL
695.69k
156.83k (x0.23)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900X
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
16.73k
21.91k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
18.59k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
5.2k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.22k
5.72k (x0.26)
TOTAL
72.51k
51.43k (x0.71)
Multithread
3900X
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
248.24k
84.92k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
309.66k
72.09k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.01k
20.13k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
58.39k
17.07k (x0.29)
TOTAL
756.3k
194.2k (x0.26)
Performance/W
3900X
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
2364 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2949 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
556 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
7203 points/W
2988 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900X
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5377 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4831 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
15763 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4