| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The 3900X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900X is 4.4 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
706e5
Core
Matisse
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
105 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
72.51k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
756.3k points
171.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4.46k
3.88k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
18.46k
14.98k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
9.7k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.71k
8.6k (x0.36)
TOTAL
54.68k
37.15k (x0.68)

Multithread

3900X

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
52.65k
14.61k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
265.41k
54.9k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.78k
27.58k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
46.91k
5.04k (x0.11)
TOTAL
505.76k
102.13k (x0.2)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3900X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
17.35k
12.89k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
25.87k
18.55k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.72k
9.93k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.86k
9.54k (x0.34)
TOTAL
79.8k
50.91k (x0.64)

Multithread

3900X

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
201.57k
50.06k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
284.41k
66.1k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
145.16k
20.24k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
100.56k
5.51k (x0.05)
TOTAL
731.7k
141.91k (x0.19)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
13.58k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
19.53k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.23k
9.37k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
9.23k (x0.37)
TOTAL
76.38k
51.7k (x0.68)

Multithread

3900X

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
196.31k
56.25k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
290.5k
73.73k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
143.95k
29.56k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.92k
5.39k (x0.08)
TOTAL
695.69k
164.94k (x0.24)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
16.73k
21.5k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
17.71k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
7.92k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.22k
8.24k (x0.37)
TOTAL
72.51k
55.37k (x0.76)

Multithread

3900X

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
248.24k
73.03k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
309.66k
68.19k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.01k
24.89k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
58.39k
5.54k (x0.09)
TOTAL
756.3k
171.65k (x0.23)

Performance/W
3900X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2364 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2949 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
556 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
7203 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5377 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4831 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
15763 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4