| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900X vs Ryzen 5 5600


Description
The 3900X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5600 is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.8 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a20f12
Core
Matisse
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
72.51k points
83.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
756.3k points
429.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900X
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.73k
22.73k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
24.59k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
11.44k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.22k
25.03k (x1.13)
TOTAL
72.51k
83.79k (x1.16)

Multithread

3900X

5600
Test#1 (Integers)
248.24k
134.28k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
309.66k
178.56k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.01k
78.16k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
58.39k
38.26k (x0.66)
TOTAL
756.3k
429.25k (x0.57)

Performance/W
3900X
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
2364 points/W
2066 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2949 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/W
1202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
556 points/W
589 points/W
TOTAL
7203 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900X
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5377 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
2599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4831 points/GHz
5688 points/GHz
TOTAL
15763 points/GHz
19043 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4