| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i9-12900KF


Description
The 3900X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 1219.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 1.6 times faster than the 3900X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
90672
Core
Matisse
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
16/24
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
July 2019
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
72.51k points
120.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
756.3k points
1219.33k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
28.96k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
30k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.23k
16.94k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.83k
17.14k (x0.69)
TOTAL
76.38k
93.05k (x1.22)

Multithread

3900X

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
196.31k
166.25k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
290.5k
172.03k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
143.95k
96.95k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.92k
55.78k (x0.86)
TOTAL
695.69k
491.01k (x0.71)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
16.73k
57.05k (x3.41)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
29.66k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
16.48k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.22k
17.78k (x0.8)
TOTAL
72.51k
120.97k (x1.67)

Multithread

3900X

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
248.24k
546.04k (x2.2)
Test#2 (FP)
309.66k
437.01k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.01k
211.36k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
58.39k
24.92k (x0.43)
TOTAL
756.3k
1219.33k (x1.61)

Performance/W
3900X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
2364 points/W
4368 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2949 points/W
3496 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
556 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
7203 points/W
9755 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
10972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5377 points/GHz
5704 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
3170 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4831 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
TOTAL
15763 points/GHz
23264 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4