Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i5-11400F
Description
The 3900X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.5 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900X gets a score of 756.3 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.5 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0671
Core
Matisse
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
72.51k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
756.3k points
495.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.73k
31.66k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
26.21k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
11.96k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.22k
18.5k (x0.83)
TOTAL
72.51k
88.34k (x1.22)
Multithread
3900X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
248.24k
210.36k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
309.66k
203.84k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
140.01k
72.05k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
58.39k
9.4k (x0.16)
TOTAL
756.3k
495.65k (x0.66)
Performance/W
3900X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2364 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2949 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1333 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
556 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
7203 points/W
7625 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5377 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4831 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
15763 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4