Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i7-10510U
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
806ec
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
59.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
190.82k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.39k
4.91k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
20.01k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
6.05k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.57k
14.16k (x0.58)
TOTAL
53.69k
45.13k (x0.84)
Multithread
3900
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
48.45k
13.79k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
230.81k
70.21k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.82k
20.05k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
54.73k
8.04k (x0.15)
TOTAL
456.8k
112.09k (x0.25)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3900
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
17.66k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
24.55k
25.46k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.55k
6.4k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.28k
14.05k (x0.53)
TOTAL
75.97k
63.57k (x0.84)
Multithread
3900
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
181.33k
54.45k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
261.01k
84.97k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
126.62k
21.26k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
66.64k
8.04k (x0.12)
TOTAL
635.6k
168.72k (x0.27)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.16k
17.52k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
23.75k
26.74k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.32k
6.22k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.17k
13.33k (x0.58)
TOTAL
72.4k
63.81k (x0.88)
Multithread
3900
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
174.73k
54.53k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
275.63k
85.61k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125.65k
20.87k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
44.17k
8.05k (x0.18)
TOTAL
620.18k
169.07k (x0.27)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
22.85k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
21.15k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
4.78k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
10.24k (x0.45)
TOTAL
74.97k
59.01k (x0.79)
Multithread
3900
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
86.08k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
79.78k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
18.26k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
6.69k (x0.18)
TOTAL
687.5k
190.82k (x0.28)
Performance/W
3900
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
5739 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
5319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
12721 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
4664 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
4316 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
975 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
2089 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
12044 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4