Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i5-6200U
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-6200U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i5-6200U gets 81.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 8.5 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i5-6200U gets 81.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 8.5 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
406e3
Core
Matisse
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
38.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
81.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
17.06k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
15.24k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
3.35k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
3.22k (x0.14)
TOTAL
74.97k
38.87k (x0.52)
Multithread
3900
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
35.68k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
33.68k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
7.74k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
4.09k (x0.11)
TOTAL
687.5k
81.18k (x0.12)
Performance/W
3900
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
2378 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
2245 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
272 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
5412 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
6091 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5445 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
13882 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4