| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i5-10300H


Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900 is 2.8 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0652
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.16k
15.65k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.75k
23.13k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.32k
5.66k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.17k
11.43k (x0.49)
TOTAL
72.4k
55.87k (x0.77)

Multithread

3900

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.73k
26.77k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
275.63k
43.81k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125.65k
10.17k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
44.17k
11.91k (x0.27)
TOTAL
620.18k
92.66k (x0.15)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
27.14k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
24.75k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
5.73k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
11.84k (x0.53)
TOTAL
74.97k
69.47k (x0.93)

Multithread

3900

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
105.77k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
107.47k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
24.82k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
8.02k (x0.22)
TOTAL
687.5k
246.07k (x0.36)

Performance/W
3900
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4