| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i3-10110U


Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900 is 6.4 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
806ec
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
106.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.39k
4.26k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
15.48k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
4.94k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.57k
4.31k (x0.18)
TOTAL
53.69k
28.98k (x0.54)

Multithread

3900

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
48.45k
7.41k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
230.81k
29.18k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.82k
10.26k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
54.73k
3.27k (x0.06)
TOTAL
456.8k
50.13k (x0.11)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3900
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
14.3k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
24.55k
20.09k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.55k
5.23k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.28k
4.24k (x0.16)
TOTAL
75.97k
43.87k (x0.58)

Multithread

3900

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
181.33k
25.51k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
261.01k
41.33k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
126.62k
10.81k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
66.64k
3.21k (x0.05)
TOTAL
635.6k
80.85k (x0.13)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.16k
14.25k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
23.75k
21.55k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.32k
5.16k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.17k
4.26k (x0.18)
TOTAL
72.4k
45.22k (x0.62)

Multithread

3900

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
174.73k
26.15k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
275.63k
44.03k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125.65k
10.71k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
44.17k
3.28k (x0.07)
TOTAL
620.18k
84.17k (x0.14)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
24.6k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
22.32k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
5.02k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
4.7k (x0.21)
TOTAL
74.97k
56.64k (x0.76)

Multithread

3900

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
47.98k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
44.28k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
10.33k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
3.98k (x0.11)
TOTAL
687.5k
106.58k (x0.16)

Performance/W
3900
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
7105 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4