Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i3-10100T
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0653
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
227.67k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.39k
4.32k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
15.7k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
5.04k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.57k
7.68k (x0.31)
TOTAL
53.69k
32.73k (x0.61)
Multithread
3900
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
48.45k
16.59k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
230.81k
71.1k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.82k
23.26k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
54.73k
3.86k (x0.07)
TOTAL
456.8k
114.81k (x0.25)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3900
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
13.84k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
24.55k
19.79k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.55k
5.28k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.28k
8.31k (x0.32)
TOTAL
75.97k
47.22k (x0.62)
Multithread
3900
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
181.33k
54.67k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
261.01k
90.71k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
126.62k
24.11k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
66.64k
3.85k (x0.06)
TOTAL
635.6k
173.34k (x0.27)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.16k
13.88k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
23.75k
20.94k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.32k
5.18k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.17k
8.2k (x0.35)
TOTAL
72.4k
48.19k (x0.67)
Multithread
3900
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
174.73k
54.88k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
275.63k
93.17k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125.65k
23.34k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
44.17k
3.85k (x0.09)
TOTAL
620.18k
175.24k (x0.28)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
24.31k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
22.15k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
5.14k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
8.46k (x0.38)
TOTAL
74.97k
60.06k (x0.8)
Multithread
3900
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
101.48k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
98.04k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
24.28k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
3.86k (x0.1)
TOTAL
687.5k
227.67k (x0.33)
Performance/W
3900
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
3503 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4