| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900 vs Ryzen 7 5700X


Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5700X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the 5700X gets 517.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.3 times faster than the 5700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a20f12
Core
Matisse
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2019
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
85.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
517.51k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.39k
4.82k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
19.73k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
11.69k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.57k
27.52k (x1.12)
TOTAL
53.69k
63.75k (x1.19)

Multithread

3900

5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
48.45k
32.8k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
230.81k
161.17k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.82k
98k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
54.73k
12.92k (x0.24)
TOTAL
456.8k
304.88k (x0.67)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
23.24k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
25.25k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
11.66k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
25.49k (x1.13)
TOTAL
74.97k
85.64k (x1.14)

Multithread

3900

5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
174.56k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
228.94k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
102.32k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
11.69k (x0.32)
TOTAL
687.5k
517.51k (x0.75)

Performance/W
3900
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
2685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
3522 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
1574 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
180 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
7962 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900
5700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
5052 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5490 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
2535 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
5540 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
18617 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4