Ryzen 9 3900 vs Ryzen 5 5600G
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 2 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 2 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a50f00
Core
Matisse
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2019
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
345.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
22.16k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
24.46k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
10.71k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
22.44k (x1)
TOTAL
74.97k
79.76k (x1.06)
Multithread
3900
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
112.5k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
153.92k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
67.75k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
11.47k (x0.31)
TOTAL
687.5k
345.64k (x0.5)
Performance/W
3900
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
5318 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4