Ryzen 9 3900 vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
810f10
Core
Matisse
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
198.27k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.39k
3.8k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
17.38k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
5.17k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.57k
3.16k (x0.13)
TOTAL
53.69k
29.52k (x0.55)
Multithread
3900
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
48.45k
15.28k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
230.81k
76.44k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.82k
27.48k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
54.73k
3.02k (x0.06)
TOTAL
456.8k
122.2k (x0.27)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3900
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
13.95k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
24.55k
20.7k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.55k
5.33k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.28k
3.03k (x0.12)
TOTAL
75.97k
43.01k (x0.57)
Multithread
3900
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
181.33k
58.56k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
261.01k
92.95k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
126.62k
28.55k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
66.64k
2.98k (x0.04)
TOTAL
635.6k
183.04k (x0.29)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.16k
13.04k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
23.75k
22.35k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.32k
5.37k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.17k
3.4k (x0.15)
TOTAL
72.4k
44.15k (x0.61)
Multithread
3900
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
174.73k
56.49k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
275.63k
100.74k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125.65k
28.21k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
44.17k
3.04k (x0.07)
TOTAL
620.18k
188.49k (x0.3)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
14.2k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
23.23k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
5.35k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
5.18k (x0.23)
TOTAL
74.97k
47.96k (x0.64)
Multithread
3900
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
58.24k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
105.72k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
28.73k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
5.59k (x0.15)
TOTAL
687.5k
198.27k (x0.29)
Performance/W
3900
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4