| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i9-12900KF


Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 1219.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 1.8 times faster than the 3900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
90672
Core
Matisse
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
16/24
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2019
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
120.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
1219.33k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
16.16k
28.96k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
23.75k
30k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.32k
16.94k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.17k
17.14k (x0.74)
TOTAL
72.4k
93.05k (x1.29)

Multithread

3900

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
174.73k
166.25k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
275.63k
172.03k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125.65k
96.95k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
44.17k
55.78k (x1.26)
TOTAL
620.18k
491.01k (x0.79)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
57.05k (x3.39)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
29.66k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
16.48k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
17.78k (x0.79)
TOTAL
74.97k
120.97k (x1.61)

Multithread

3900

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
546.04k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
437.01k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
211.36k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
24.92k (x0.68)
TOTAL
687.5k
1219.33k (x1.77)

Performance/W
3900
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
4368 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
3496 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
9755 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
10972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5704 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
3170 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
23264 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4