| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i7-1195G7


Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900 is 2.9 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
806c2
Core
Matisse
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2019
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.39k
4.57k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
17.21k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
9.97k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.57k
14.98k (x0.61)
TOTAL
53.69k
46.75k (x0.87)

Multithread

3900

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
48.45k
12.75k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
230.81k
45.98k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.82k
27.86k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
54.73k
20.06k (x0.37)
TOTAL
456.8k
106.66k (x0.23)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
30.89k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
25.57k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
10.64k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
15.66k (x0.69)
TOTAL
74.97k
82.77k (x1.1)

Multithread

3900

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
96.34k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
95.75k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
32.29k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
15.2k (x0.41)
TOTAL
687.5k
239.58k (x0.35)

Performance/W
3900
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4