Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i7-1185G7
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
806c1
Core
Matisse
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
230.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
24.35k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
20.07k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
8.61k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
7.84k (x0.35)
TOTAL
74.97k
60.87k (x0.81)
Multithread
3900
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
93.58k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
94.71k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
33.28k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
9.34k (x0.25)
TOTAL
687.5k
230.91k (x0.34)
Performance/W
3900
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
8247 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4