| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i7-11700F


Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-11700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0671
Core
Matisse
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
512.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
32.55k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
26.95k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
10.76k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
19.32k (x0.86)
TOTAL
74.97k
89.58k (x1.19)

Multithread

3900

i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
232.06k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
203.56k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
72.89k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
3.81k (x0.1)
TOTAL
687.5k
512.32k (x0.75)

Performance/W
3900
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
7882 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4