| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i7-11700


Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i7-11700 gets 729 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 1.1 times faster than the 3900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0671
Core
Matisse
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
98.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
728.98k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
4.39k
5.48k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
20.99k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
12.58k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.57k
21.24k (x0.86)
TOTAL
53.69k
60.28k (x1.12)

Multithread

3900

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
48.45k
44.15k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
230.81k
196.6k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.82k
102.57k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
54.73k
10.64k (x0.19)
TOTAL
456.8k
353.96k (x0.77)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3900
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
18.05k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
24.55k
26.13k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.55k
13.92k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.28k
21.22k (x0.81)
TOTAL
75.97k
79.32k (x1.04)

Multithread

3900

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
181.33k
160.49k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
261.01k
225.25k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
126.62k
113.88k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
66.64k
10.64k (x0.16)
TOTAL
635.6k
510.25k (x0.8)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
16.16k
18.96k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
23.75k
28.34k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.32k
13.26k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.17k
20.2k (x0.87)
TOTAL
72.4k
80.76k (x1.12)

Multithread

3900

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
174.73k
164.31k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
275.63k
253.96k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125.65k
115.28k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
44.17k
10.65k (x0.24)
TOTAL
620.18k
544.2k (x0.88)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
35.12k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
29.24k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
12.56k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
21.95k (x0.97)
TOTAL
74.97k
98.87k (x1.32)

Multithread

3900

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
304k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
304.7k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
109.64k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
10.64k (x0.29)
TOTAL
687.5k
728.98k (x1.06)

Performance/W
3900
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
4677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
4688 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
11215 points/W

Performance/GHz
3900
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
7168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
2563 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
20177 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4