Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i3-1115G4
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 5 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 5 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
806c1
Core
Matisse
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/4
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
137.96k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3900
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.39k
3.75k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
16.99k
17.22k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
9.79k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.57k
8.21k (x0.33)
TOTAL
53.69k
38.97k (x0.73)
Multithread
3900
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
48.45k
9.19k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
230.81k
35.47k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.82k
19.14k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
54.73k
5.82k (x0.11)
TOTAL
456.8k
69.62k (x0.15)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3900
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.59k
12.9k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
24.55k
21.4k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.55k
10.73k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.28k
8.16k (x0.31)
TOTAL
75.97k
53.19k (x0.7)
Multithread
3900
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
181.33k
30.31k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
261.01k
45.13k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
126.62k
20.17k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
66.64k
5.77k (x0.09)
TOTAL
635.6k
101.38k (x0.16)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3900
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.16k
14.65k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
23.75k
21.57k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.32k
9.93k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.17k
8.02k (x0.35)
TOTAL
72.4k
54.18k (x0.75)
Multithread
3900
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
174.73k
32.14k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
275.63k
43.54k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125.65k
19.58k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
44.17k
5.61k (x0.13)
TOTAL
620.18k
100.87k (x0.16)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
24.25k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
21.63k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
9.09k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
7.23k (x0.32)
TOTAL
74.97k
62.19k (x0.83)
Multithread
3900
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
56.9k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
55.68k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
19.29k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
6.09k (x0.17)
TOTAL
687.5k
137.96k (x0.2)
Performance/W
3900
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4