| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Core i9-10900X


Description
The 4750GE is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4750GE gets a score of 469.7 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.3 times faster than the 4750GE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
50657
Core
Renoir
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
35 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
19712 kB
Date
July 2020
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.99k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
469.67k points
632.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4750GE
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
25.97k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
26.26k
22.37k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
5.3k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
8.63k (x1.03)
TOTAL
60.99k
62.28k (x1.02)

Multithread

4750GE

i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
159.87k
281.98k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
215.44k
259.01k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.45k
64.87k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
26.5k (x4.49)
TOTAL
469.67k
632.35k (x1.35)

Performance/W
4750GE
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6155 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2527 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
169 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
13419 points/W
3832 points/W

Performance/GHz
4750GE
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3942 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6107 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2185 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1950 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
14184 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4