| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Core i5-8250U


Description
The 4750GE is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4750GE gets a score of 469.7 k points while the i5-8250U gets 161.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 4750GE is 2.9 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
806ea
Core
Renoir
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2020
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
60.99k points
54.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
469.67k points
161.26k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4750GE
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
22.11k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
26.26k
19.64k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
4.54k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
8.03k (x0.96)
TOTAL
60.99k
54.31k (x0.89)

Multithread

4750GE

i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
159.87k
74.19k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
215.44k
66.27k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.45k
15.97k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
4.83k (x0.82)
TOTAL
469.67k
161.26k (x0.34)

Performance/W
4750GE
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
4946 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6155 points/W
4418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2527 points/W
1065 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
169 points/W
322 points/W
TOTAL
13419 points/W
10751 points/W

Performance/GHz
4750GE
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3942 points/GHz
6503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6107 points/GHz
5777 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2185 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1950 points/GHz
2361 points/GHz
TOTAL
14184 points/GHz
15975 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4