| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Core i5-10600K


Description
The 4750GE is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4750GE gets a score of 469.7 k points while the i5-10600K gets 352.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 4750GE is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0655
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.99k points
73.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
469.67k points
352.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4750GE
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
30.11k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
26.26k
26.16k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
6.01k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
10.77k (x1.28)
TOTAL
60.99k
73.05k (x1.2)

Multithread

4750GE

i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
159.87k
158.82k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
215.44k
150.39k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.45k
36.56k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
7.11k (x1.2)
TOTAL
469.67k
352.88k (x0.75)

Performance/W
4750GE
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
1271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6155 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2527 points/W
293 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
169 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
13419 points/W
2823 points/W

Performance/GHz
4750GE
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3942 points/GHz
6273 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6107 points/GHz
5449 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2185 points/GHz
1252 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1950 points/GHz
2243 points/GHz
TOTAL
14184 points/GHz
15218 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4