Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Core i3-8100
Description
The 4750GE is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4750GE gets a score of 469.7 k points while the i3-8100 gets 200.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 4750GE is 2.3 times faster than the i3-8100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4750GE gets a score of 469.7 k points while the i3-8100 gets 200.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 4750GE is 2.3 times faster than the i3-8100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906eb
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2020
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
60.99k points
59.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
469.67k points
200.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4750GE
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
24.47k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
26.26k
21.52k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
4.95k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
8.24k (x0.98)
TOTAL
60.99k
59.18k (x0.97)
Multithread
4750GE
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
159.87k
92.86k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
215.44k
83.05k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.45k
18.55k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
5.93k (x1)
TOTAL
469.67k
200.4k (x0.43)
Performance/W
4750GE
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
1429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6155 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2527 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
169 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
13419 points/W
3083 points/W
Performance/GHz
4750GE
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
3942 points/GHz
6797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6107 points/GHz
5977 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2185 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1950 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
14184 points/GHz
16438 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4