| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Ryzen 9 5900HS


Description
The 4750GE is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4750GE gets a score of 469.7 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.

Summarizing, the 4750GE is 1.1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a50f00
Core
Renoir
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2020
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
60.99k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
469.67k points
434.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4750GE
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
21.2k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
26.26k
25k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
11.44k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
24.22k (x2.89)
TOTAL
60.99k
81.87k (x1.34)

Multithread

4750GE

5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
159.87k
145.13k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
215.44k
198.36k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.45k
85.67k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
5.79k (x0.98)
TOTAL
469.67k
434.96k (x0.93)

Performance/W
4750GE
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6155 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2527 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
169 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
13419 points/W
12427 points/W

Performance/GHz
4750GE
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3942 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6107 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2185 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1950 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
14184 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4