| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Ryzen 7 3750H


Description
The 4750GE is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4750GE gets a score of 469.7 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 4750GE is 2.7 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
810f81
Core
Renoir
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
60.99k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
469.67k points
175.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4750GE
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
13.72k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
26.26k
22.93k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
4.99k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
5.27k (x0.63)
TOTAL
60.99k
46.91k (x0.77)

Multithread

4750GE

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
159.87k
50.54k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
215.44k
93.33k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.45k
25.25k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
6.07k (x1.03)
TOTAL
469.67k
175.18k (x0.37)

Performance/W
4750GE
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6155 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2527 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
169 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
13419 points/W
5005 points/W

Performance/GHz
4750GE
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3942 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6107 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2185 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1950 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
14184 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4