| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Ryzen 5 2600X


Description
The 4750GE is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4750GE gets a score of 469.7 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 4750GE is 1.4 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
800f82
Core
Renoir
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
60.99k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
469.67k points
333.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4750GE
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
15.75k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
26.26k
26.29k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
5.91k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
18.48k (x2.2)
TOTAL
60.99k
66.44k (x1.09)

Multithread

4750GE

2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
159.87k
94.49k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
215.44k
182.53k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.45k
45.95k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
10.15k (x1.72)
TOTAL
469.67k
333.12k (x0.71)

Performance/W
4750GE
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6155 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2527 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
169 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
13419 points/W
3507 points/W

Performance/GHz
4750GE
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3942 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6107 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2185 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1950 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
14184 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4