| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Core i7-1260P


Description
The 4750GE is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4750GE gets a score of 469.7 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 4750GE is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
906a3
Core
Renoir
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/16
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
July 2020
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
60.99k points
94.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
469.67k points
391.07k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4750GE
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
41.94k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
26.26k
26.81k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
12.63k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
13.51k (x1.61)
TOTAL
60.99k
94.9k (x1.56)

Multithread

4750GE

i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
159.87k
168.12k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
215.44k
148.09k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.45k
60.28k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
14.58k (x2.47)
TOTAL
469.67k
391.07k (x0.83)

Performance/W
4750GE
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
6004 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6155 points/W
5289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2527 points/W
2153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
169 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
13419 points/W
13967 points/W

Performance/GHz
4750GE
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
3942 points/GHz
8924 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6107 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2185 points/GHz
2687 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1950 points/GHz
2875 points/GHz
TOTAL
14184 points/GHz
20191 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4