| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Core i5-11400


Description
The 4750GE is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4750GE gets a score of 469.7 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1 times faster than the 4750GE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0671
Core
Renoir
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
60.99k points
86.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
469.67k points
489.31k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4750GE
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
31.23k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
26.26k
25.88k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
10.83k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
18.17k (x2.17)
TOTAL
60.99k
86.11k (x1.41)

Multithread

4750GE

i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
159.87k
213.85k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
215.44k
195.51k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.45k
72.06k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
7.89k (x1.34)
TOTAL
469.67k
489.31k (x1.04)

Performance/W
4750GE
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
3290 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6155 points/W
3008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2527 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
169 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
13419 points/W
7528 points/W

Performance/GHz
4750GE
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
3942 points/GHz
7098 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6107 points/GHz
5881 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2185 points/GHz
2461 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1950 points/GHz
4130 points/GHz
TOTAL
14184 points/GHz
19570 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4