Ryzen 7 6800H vs Xeon E5-2667 v3
Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a40f41
306f2
Core
Rembrandt
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
343.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
20.99k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
11.9k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
4.72k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
3.75k (x0.15)
TOTAL
77.93k
41.36k (x0.53)
Multithread
6800H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
172.62k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
110.03k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
44.06k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
16.93k (x1.15)
TOTAL
478.73k
343.64k (x0.72)
Performance/W
6800H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
2545 points/W
Performance/GHz
6800H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4