Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i9-9900K
Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a40f41
906ed
Core
Rembrandt
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
529.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
32.08k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
28.17k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
6.68k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
14.98k (x0.62)
TOTAL
77.93k
81.91k (x1.05)
Multithread
6800H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
242.98k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
220.16k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
53.97k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
12.22k (x0.83)
TOTAL
478.73k
529.32k (x1.11)
Performance/W
6800H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
5572 points/W
Performance/GHz
6800H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4