Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i9-10900KF
Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.7 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.7 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a40f41
a0655
Core
Rembrandt
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
45 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
825.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
35.87k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
31.43k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
7.34k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
15.73k (x0.65)
TOTAL
77.93k
90.37k (x1.16)
Multithread
6800H
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
377.56k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
347.59k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
88.08k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
12.24k (x0.83)
TOTAL
478.73k
825.47k (x1.72)
Performance/W
6800H
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
6800H
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4